Why We Fail

epic-fail-guy-sourceIn April, 2013, the department store chain JC Penney fired its CEO, former Apple executive Ron Johnson. It’s a move that makes sense, because if there’s one thing Apple is known for, it’s failure, right? Why would JC Penney want someone from that corporate world running their company?

The irony of the firing is: Johnson was originally brought in to save the company; JC Penney was losing market share because it catered to an older demographic. Johnson did a great job making Apple hip; he was hired to give JC Penney that same cool factor.

Johnson had a plan:  Seeing as the old business model was as follows—take a $10 shirt. Mark the $10 shirt up to $20, then offer the customer a $10 off coupon so they could think they were getting a bargain—he wanted to create simplicity in pricing. Johnson wanted to (and did) change all that; he said “Instead of artificially inflating prices, then pretending to lower them, why not just set decent prices to begin with, and maybe offer some sales on the side?”

Why not? Because Penney’s loyal base was comprised of panicky, stupid people.

Straightforward low-price advertising was instigated, and sales plummeted.

Such a simple idea was indigestible to the middle-and-upper age house moms who shopped at Penney’s. Where were their sales? Where were their coupons? They were getting ripped off! No matter how often it was explained they were paying the same or even less than they had been, it didn’t placate the angry mob of moms; they missed their fake savings.

Another crazy thing Johnson did was on Thanksgiving day, 2012. If you missed it, JC Penney’s took out a full page newspaper ad stating they wouldn’t open for business until 6am Friday morning. While every other store in the world fired their “SALE DAY!” salvo earlier and earlier on Thanksgiving, JC Penney’s was having none of it. “Thanksgiving is a time for family,” the ad stated, “and our employees should be home with theirs.”

A store not maximizing profit? A store caring more about family than money?

BLASPHEMY!

Johnson called for calm, saying that it takes time to smooth things out after an upheaval, and showed his long-term plans to everyone: This is where we are now, this is how the stores should be re-modeled to bring in younger customers, this is where we’ll be in 6 months, 12 months, 18 months…

But that was too much to digest for the fast-food investors who wanted results IMMEDIATELY! To hell with long-term planning, we have dumb customers who are unhappy; we need to cater to their inability to grow and change NOW.

Johnson was fired, and Penney’s apologized in an advertisement, explaining to stupid people: “You’re right; why would we want to be a progressive store?  Let’s die like dinosaurs!”

Apparently they didn’t watch The Gap maintain the status quo and continually wither away.

And that is why we can’t have nice things.

The Best Worst Parent

FattyThere are things you know you shouldn’t do, yet you do them anyway. Case in point: upon getting Hilly out of her crib recently, I realized I had to do some #1 business in the bathroom.

Hilly was post-nap groggy, so I figured—even though she’s been mobile for a while now—putting her dead center of our King Size Bed would be safe.

One toy to distract her; always within sight by yours truly: yup, safe.

I plopped her down, walked the seven feet into the bathroom, and let fly my yellow stream of freedom.

Which is exactly when Hilly decided to laugh and bee line it straight toward me.

Ever-ready, I was aiming with my left hand just in case my dominant right hand needed the freedom of use.

I pinched off and dove toward Hilly, arriving just as she tumbled over the edge, rug-burning the shit out of my left knee in the slide.

She was giggling, so I did the same; no reason to get her all panicked.

I exhaled, thankful that the worst that could have happened, didn’t, then realized I was kneeling next to the bed with myself in one hand, and my daughter in the other.

So, I plopped her on the floor (which is where she should have been in the first place), stood, walked back to the ceramic god and finished up.

I was relieved in two senses of the word: physically and emotionally.

While I will never again put her on the bed while I away to expunge bodily waste, I do have to say: seriously, it was almost as good a catch as Antonio Freeman keeping the ball off the ground to win against the Vikings in OT.

(“He did WHAT?”)

(Also: my knee = OW)

A Little Something About Alec Baldwin

Only one of these men is Alec; do you know which?

Only one of these men is Alec; do you know which?

When I lived in Los Angeles, I worked in the arena of property representation for film projects. The company that employed me acted as a liaison between working properties—office buildings, abandoned warehouses/hospitals, private parks, etc.—and TV/film productions that didn’t want to have to build a set for every scene they needed.

For example: you’d never guess this, but the very same office was used as:

  • A police station in Robbery Homicide Division and the pilot episode of Cold Case
  • A newspaper newsroom in the ABC series Night Stalker
  • Television offices in the movie The Insider
  • A law office in the movie Collateral

Same building, same floor, same exact space, all made to look different and represent different cities.

I could probably write a half-dozen stories involving celebrities who were complete and total dicks, but I’m always torn when it comes to the mercurial substance known as Karma. On the one hand, if Karma existed, then how did some of those complete and total dicks become rich and famous? On the other hand, if I write about what complete and total dicks they are, I fully believe something negative would happen to me.

(Karma)

It’s illogical and stupid, but it’s how I feel, so I’m fucked.

So, if negativity is off the table, then positivity remains. There is a laundry list of people I had kind interactions with—Jason Statham, Tim Matheson (Otter!)—but two memories really stand out to me.

The first involves not a production day, but one I was spending as an office drone. A location scout called inquiring about a property; a director was searching for the right location to capture a mood. Could someone meet him at a certain building at a certain time so he could snap some pictures?

In full candor, I didn’t wanna.

If I went, I had two irritating means-of-transportation options: by foot or car. If I drove, I’d have to deal with downtown LA traffic and parking, neither of which is much fun. If I walked, I’d be in +90 degrees heat in my dress clothes and be sweating like *insert your favorite hack line about sweating here*

(Examples: sweating like Mel Gibson at a NAACP meeting; Rihanna at a spelling bee, Justin Bieber at a NAMBLA meeting, etc.)

Neither idea seemed very fun to me.

I told the scout someone would meet him, and then started calling my collogues already in the field: who could bop on over to the building in question and show this guy around? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

No one wanted to do it; everyone had an excuse. It fell to me to take my grumpy ass out of the air-conditioned office and across the city.

Bah.

I arrived a little early and waited by the security desk. A short while later, a quartet of men walked in the far side of the lobby and made straight into the elevator banks. One man looked like a location scout; the other three were just in casual clothes. I started heading their way.

Within seconds, the location scout came back into view; I figured they tried going up on their own and been stymied. This was all post 9/11, and you couldn’t just get on an elevator in a skyscraper and go up; they were on lockdown unless you had a security pass.

I approached with a wave as the scout said: “I brought the director, writer, and a producer.”

I shrugged; fine by me. One person or 20, it didn’t change what I had to do.

When you work on film shoots, you become accustomed to seeing famous people. It’s in the job description, and you act accordingly.  Case in point: I was once asked to cover for a friend working a Heineken commercial being filmed by David Fincher. I thought to myself, “If someone of his stature is working on a beer commercial, they probably have some money sunk into it.” Sure enough, as I wandered the set, I saw Brad Pitt rehearsing. I wasn’t fazed; it made sense. Pitt and Fincher got along, and enjoyed making movies together. I thought, “Neat,” and kept moving. It wasn’t my place to approach or bother him.

In the lobby of the building that day, rounding the corner by the elevator banks I came face to face with a trio of men involved in light conversation. Seeing their location scout return, they looked up, and upon seeing me one stuck out his hand and said, “Hi, I’m George” with a smile.

And I was taken aback.

I knew he was “George,” because his last name was “Clooney.”

I recognized one of the people as Grant Heslov, but I knew him as the actor from True Lies; I had no idea he was Clooney’s writing partner.

I introduced myself, somewhat dazed, and watched as my clumsy paw shook George Clooney’s hand. I then took them to the floor they wanted to visit, answered a couple questions, then hung back and let them examine the space to their heart’s desire.

When all was said and done, I took them back down and showed them out. Before leaving Mr. Clooney turned back to me, stuck his hand out once again, and said, “Nathan, thanks for helping us out today.” In essence, he thanked me for doing my job, something I didn’t need to be thanked for.

It was a cool little moment to me, because (1) I hadn’t wanted to go on the scout in the first place, (2) I hadn’t expected to see anyone famous, much less A-List famous, and (3) he was so goddamned kind to me.

They didn’t end up using the property, but the film they shot was the excellent Good Night and Good Luck.

Another moment I had was on a film being made by a nervous, first-time director. He had friends in high places—which is always more important than talent or creativity in Hollywood—and was throwing together a mess of a movie: a comedy without laughs.

The movie had a couple name stars, and then was able to wrangle even more name actors for minor roles.  I was unlucky enough to get copy of the script, and winced as every “hilarious” action was written in all caps, as if to accentuate the hijinks: “He gets into his car, yells his dramatic line, AND THEN BACKS UP DOWN INTO A DITCH BECAUSE HE DIDN’T KNOW THE CAR WAS IN REVERSE, HAHAHAHAHAHA!”

(The script didn’t actually say “Hahahaha,” but it might as well have)

Script-doctoring wasn’t my job, and my input was in absolutely no way required, wanted, or important to them, so I just did my best to conceal myself in the corners.

Until one day at lunch, that is. On one particular day, I went from hiding in the shadows to front-and-center, because… well, I felt like it.

I had gotten to know a few of the underlings on the crew—production assistants and other low-level workers—and enjoyed their company. I don’t remember the kid’s actual name but one of the production assistants—I’ll call him Scott—was having a birthday. He was turning nineteen, and fresh off the boat from Ohio. This was his first experience in film.

At lunch, I waited until the entire crew had gone through the line and was seated, then grabbed Scott and yelled out loudly: “Excuse me! Can I have your attention for a second? I’m sure you all know Scott, he’s the gofer that gets you whatever you need whenever you need it, but did you know it’s his birthday today? This is the first film he’s ever worked on, and he’s turning nineteen right now, so on the count of three, everyone yell ‘Happy Birthday!’ One, two…”

And three.

Upon that third number being uttered by yours truly, a cry arose from the crew, a bellowed “Happy Birthday!” from all.

I heard, but did not see from where, a loud thumping; someone was pounding their table in celebration in a “Hear-hear!” sort of merriment.

And that was that. Scott turned beet red; I went off to scrounge some food before catering packed up. A few minutes later, lunch tray in hand, I sat down at a table and looked up to see Alec Baldwin facing me, one table over. He was one of the secondary actors in the film.

escapology-4decc50666d6b

I worked this shoot and am pleased to say not only was Robbie Williams exceedingly nice to everyone, but also: this is real. He suspended himself over the ledge of a skyscraper in LA.

I was slightly surprised; most name actors went back to their personal trailers for lunch. And I don’t mean for this film, I mean in general. Actors don’t eat with the crew. The star of this movie not only left for lunch, but also went and hid in his private trailer every chance he could. Hell, I even rode up in an elevator with the main star once, but didn’t realize it because he tucked himself away in a corner and had on a baseball hat and sunglasses. The elevator contained three people: the actor, one of the set assistants, and me. She and I chatted for the entire ride, and I didn’t realize the star was the other person until the doors opened and he darted out past us and into his private cubicle, where he would wait out of sight of we commoners until called.

Yet there Alec was, eating and chatting it up with everyone.

Scott eventually sat down next to me, and I pointed out Mr. Baldwin: “I didn’t know he was in here,” I said. “Think he wished you a happy birthday?“

“I know he did,” Scott explained. “That’s why I turned red. Alec was pounding on the table and clapping for me.”

Well, neat. That’s who the overly-enthused person was: Alec Baldwin. He had been clapping for a nineteen-year-old kid on his first film production with no ego invested in the situation at all.

Not that it means anything, but the next day I waited until the line expired and went for lunch; Alec was at the back of the line.

When I walked up, he turned, looked at me, and broke into a wide smile, graciously saying, “No, no! You go ahead of me. I don’t have to be back on set for a while.”

I tried to demur, but he took my shoulder and pushed me in front of him, ending the movement with a back slap and another smile.

He didn’t want anyone to have to wait for him; “Crew eats first.”

Nice guy, that Alec Baldwin.

A Self-Inflicted Wound

Blood in the Water

Blood in the Water

I recently had the dubious honor to work in a state where legislators and voters alike think it’s still 1950. Smoking is apparently “awesome,” and of course it’s allowed indoors.

So, upon returning to my place of temporary lodging after a performance, I would smell like Keith Richards. Only without the heroin tracks on my arms. Or the millions of dollars in my bank account and icon status.

One night, winding down after my show, I found myself online, perusing web pages that contained moving images of gorgeous women performing sexual acts. It was fascinating stuff, and I noticed that the more I browsed, the more my nether-regions started to tingle. If I may be blunt: the moving pictures of gorgeous women performing sexual acts made my pee-pee grow quite turgid.

Since I already had cigarette smoke caked into my pores, I decided that it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to jump in the shower and wash off. I also figured that such a location wouldn’t be such a bad place to have what Kevin Spacey described in American Beauty as, “The best part of my day.”

I fired up the shower, and noticed that the showerhead contained several settings, one of which was “pulsating.”  This was also the setting the showerhead was currently placed upon.

Well, those “massage” settings are always silly at best, or made for women with a little extra time on their hands at worst—wink-wink ladies—not men desiring cleanliness. I hopped in and decided to set it to a nice, normal stream.

What I hadn’t seen was that a chunk of the plastic was broken off of the nozzle, leaving a hole with jagged edges. Spinning the dial, my hand slipped and my thumb shot across said jagged, plastic edges, creating a lovely little gash spewing blood everywhere.

Now I had a dilemma.

I had an injury, and… let’s say “unfinished business.”

What to do… What to do?

Whatever, to do?

I’m not going to go into detail, but I will say this:

“What did Jesus do,
When they sentanced him to die?
Did he try to run away?
Did he just break down and cry?

No, Jesus dug down deep,
Knowing what he had to do-
When faced with his own death,
Jesus knew that he had to…”

The Bliss Ignorance Offers

David_Leisure_Joe_Isuzu_ResizedI want you to imagine a different way of looking at something: take the quarterback of a football team. Now, pretend he’s playing that position because he’s popular, not that he’s popular because he’s the quarterback. Pretend he got the job by being affable, not skilled or in possession of a powerful throwing arm.  Doesn’t make any sense, does it? Welcome to the world of stand-up comedy.

On February 19, 2013, Twitter-icon Rob Delaney took to the stage on Jimmy Kimmel Live and delivered a set so mind-numbingly awful, you almost have to wonder if it was a form of performance art. Was he doing to comedy what Joaquin Phoenix did to celebrity in his fake documentary?

This isn’t a matter of opinion—like one person preferring Lewis Black and another Jeff Foxworthy—this was straightforward excruciating. I know people that can’t finish watching the entire set; other say they were only able to because they were transfixed by the train-wreck aspect to it all.

Immediately the comedy world was ablaze with ire directed Delaney’s way. Personally, I have nothing for or against him. I hadn’t even heard of him until March 22nd, over a full month after his public humiliation.

I did a little research, and discovered Rob Delaney is a dad, writer, recovering alcoholic, and overall just someone trying to do exactly what I did in Los Angeles: make it. Given Delaney made it to TV, however, shows he seems to be having a better go of it than I did.

Delaney made a name for himself on Twitter; in the 2012 election, he hounded Mitt Romney, and in the process gained himself almost a million followers. Hollywood took notice. He was given agents, managers, television slots, dates in clubs… all the things working comics struggle for. What he may not have realized, and what the industry doesn’t care about, is that an ability to be witty in 140 characters doesn’t mean you can be captivating on stage for an hour.

Watching his set made me slightly depressed. When you work in an industry, when you care about an art form, being alerted to the state it’s in is a punch to the gut. Comedy is not like baseball, where there are AAA farm teams that grow and develop players; comedy takes advantage of what’s out there, good, bad, or atrocious, as long as it’s got something to exploit.

Cashing in on the flavor of the moment is nothing new; before Delaney was “Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire” contestant Rick Rockwell. There was Screech, from Saved by the Bell, Skippy from Family Ties, and most famously Charlie Sheen. At the height of his Two and a Half Men battles, he said, “I’ll go on tour! I can stand on stage, and people will adore me!”

They didn’t understand something Jerry Seinfeld said in his documentary, Comedian: Fame only gets you two minutes of awe. After that, you better be funny or the audience will turn on you. Charlie Sheen learned that immediately; his tour was marred by those who had stupidly turned over their hard earned money, discovered the “show” was Sheen hanging out, thinking is persona was interesting enough to warrant being in a spotlight, and booing vociferously in anger.

Yet despite those repeated, public failures, people are captivated by celebrity; if they weren’t the same shtick wouldn’t work repeatedly.

Which brings us full-circle to the beginning.

I’m not angry with Rob Delaney for wanting to make a living in Hollywood or getting a break on TV, what I want to know is why no one that came in contact with him ever pointed out “The Emperor has no Clothes?” Did no producer vet his résumé? Did no staffer watch a run through, and say, “Um… is this really the set he’s performing tonight?” I would love to think that out there, somewhere, a producer is smiling slyly, saying they did it to expose the system for the fraud it is, but I highly doubt that is the case. In reality, he just became the Sarah Palin of the comedy world; someone who looked like a good idea on paper, but once words came spilling out the mouth…

If there’s anything upsetting about what happened, it’s the fact the clip of Delaney’s awful set keeps disappearing from the Internet. His powerful managers/agents/what have you are covering the whole fiasco up. It was pulled from Jimmy Kimmel Live immediately (the rest of the show is still available), and seems to only last on any site for a day or two. By hiding his lack of ability, the Hollywood machine can continue to bank on Delaney up to the point word has spread far and wide that he’s awful and people stop buying tickets.

People have oft asked me why I never tried out for Last Comic Standing when they held auditions; I have two answers.

Many, many years ago, HBO held a cattle call audition for stand-up comedians; I drove from Milwaukee to St. Louis to be seen. Two hundred people showed up, and the day was broken into morning and afternoon segments. Three slots before mine, I noticed the HBO scout talking on her phone, ignoring performers. She talked and talked, and I watched as hopeful folks took to the stage and were unseen. Today, I probably would have been a brazen little shit and called her out from the stage, stealing from Tootsie and asking, “I’m sorry, is my auditioning interrupting your talking?”—back then I was too green to pull such a stunt. I watched from the stage as she talked all through my set, never once glancing at me. A six-hour drive for nothing; six hours back to stew over the injustice.

The second reason I didn’t audition for LCS is because of inside information. When I lived in LA, I worked in property representation for filming locations. If you don’t know what that means, it’s not important. All you need to understand is: on the job, I didn’t wear the badge “Comedian.”

One day, a co-worker and I ran into someone he knew from a film shoot. We were at Target, and they began talking shop.

“What have you been working on?” my friend asked.

The man—a member of the grip/electric union—rolled his eyes; “I just got off the road. You ever hear of that show, Last Comic Standing? I just did season two with them on location, as they traveled around ‘searching’ for new talent.”

The words “searching for new talent” were said mockingly, with an eye-roll.

He explained that the way the show worked was: in every city, managers were having their clients flown in from Hollywood. That way, the show could pretend, “Person X was discovered in this city, and person Y was discovered in this city.” Because having a show where everyone in the house was from Los Angeles might look a little suspicious.

The man explained that: at every location, a crew was sent outside to film the line of local comedians who had been waiting all night. They were to get a couple “kooky moments,” and show how many people were excited by having LCS in their town.

Then, the first ten/twenty were brought in, essentially “To be made fun of.” They would show what each had done out of context, or even make them uncomfortable and then film that.  The awkward footage would then make the final cut, shown Jerry Springer-style: Look at these losers!

The grip/electric man did not know I was a comedian; he didn’t know he was giving me insight into a shaped industry. He was just saying what he—someone on the outside looking in—had experienced.

Single MomsThe icing on that season’s cake, if you remember, was having celebrity judges Drew Carrey and Brett Butler explode when the final house contestants were named. They had chosen the most-funny contestants; NBC producers overrode those decisions behind their back and announced who they wanted on the program. They were outright stating: “We don’t care about funny or original, we’re looking for what we’re looking for, so fuck off.”

(Four years later, a club owner in Canada would state nothing had changed; contestants were still waiting all night in order to be dismissed after being berated on camera, while favorites were flown in and given scheduled slots.)

Overall, I’m not surprised Delaney was handed the keys to the city—in an era where Kim Kardishian is a household name, talent is obviously not a necessity for fame—I’m just saddened by it. He gets on television; meanwhile, the clubs I work are losing business thanks to governmental legislation.

Head Desk

urlI don’t know how many times I have to say this; I think I’m about to pop a blood vessel in my head.

Right now, there are two instances in the news where an adult woman has “Sexually Assaulted” a teenage boy: former Tennessee Titans cheerleader Elizabeth Leigh Garner, and teaching assistant Katheryn L. Carmean.

I will break this down one last time: when it comes to an adult woman having sex with a teenage boy, there are two ways for it to fall.

They are:

 

Elizabeth Leigh Garner + Young Boy = NOT sexual assault

(Could even be argued “Winning the lottery”)

0320-elizabeth-garner-titans-1

.

Katheryn L. Carmean + Young boy = ABSOLUTELY sexual assault

(She should have to pay for his lifetime of therapy)

katheryn-carmean

 

To say these two cases are even remotely similar would be like every windy day is a hurricane.  It’s lazy journalism, and we should demand better.

(Anyone that tries to come back with “What about an adult man and a teenage girl,” just stop it.  Just… stop.)

A Little Ditty About Death

LensImpressions-03-94“The hand that killed your sons masturbates to the memory.”

~T.J. Lane, to the families of his murder victims.

 

I remember seeing the film Dead Man Walking in the theater. Designed to be an anti-death penalty movie, it told the fictional tale of a man played by Sean Penn, someone who was on death row for raping a girl and killing her boyfriend. Throughout the entirety of the movie, the viewer is told two things: one, that Sean Penn’s character has maintained his innocence the entire time he has awaited execution. Two: that his character is an enormous piece of shit.

For the whole movie, my overriding thought was, “OK, so he’s innocent of the rape/murder… look at his rap sheet; kill him for that alone.”

At the end of the movie, as he is about to be put to death, he gives a tearful confession to a nun (played by Susan Sarandon), stating that he wants absolution from all his sins, and that he has been lying: he did kill the boy and rape the girl.

I very audibly said, “Oh what the fuck?” right then and there, and several people who had been sobbing turned to glare at me.

I couldn’t help it; I was pissed. I thought the film was going to be a discussion of how the system is flawed, and innocents die, but in the end he was guilty and just felt bad about getting his just deserts? What the hell was the point of that?

There exist a few severely pointed subjects that have the unique ability to polarize opinions. Abortion, politics, and the death penalty are the big three. When they arise, conversation devolves into talking points being shouted ever louder, with no one on either side really listening. On the wonderful world of the Internets, Facebook specifically, users post their thoughts viciously and vociferously, generally without paying attention to what was said before or after them. Using my profile as a forum, I stated that I did not understand how anyone could be against the death penalty.

There was some good back and forth; there was some inane banter.

Here, in my opinion, is some of the best of it, arranged in a tidier format than the slog of a FB scroll.

 

Argument: If you aren’t willing to kill them yourself, you shouldn’t be an advocate for death.

Counter: I’m not a fan of changing the oil in my car, does this mean I should never be allowed to take it to a mechanic? There are people willing to do literally every job out there. I’m not sure why a boundary needs drawn at executioner. Am I comparing life to an oil change? Yes. In fact, I’ll go on record and state the well-being and maintenance of my car is more important than some human life.

(See quote above)

 

Argument: Put him in general population or solitary confinement and let him suffer for the rest of his life.

Counter: And you don’t think that affects the overall mood of the collective consciousness, how? There was a study done on transcendental meditation, and how that created inner peace. It was believed that the more people that meditated, the more peace there would be in the world. The idea of collective soul is that while we may be our own identities, we are still all connected. Thus, when more of us are happy, the world is a better place. When more of us are unhappy, however…

So why would you want to create a prison population, where groups of unhappy people are gathered together? All they do is pour negative energy back into the collective, and that sucks for everyone.

If you want a murderer or molester to suffer, I’m all for it. I say we take him up in a plane and toss him out without a parachute. That would be absolute pure terror. For the last minute or two of his life, he could think of every person he hurt, and then boom: nothingness. I’d say being dropped out of an airplane is worth a lifetime of prison suffering.

 

Argument: The death penalty costs too much.

Counter: So that means you just walk away? Nothing can change? You can’t fight to make it work more effectively? Going back to the “You shouldn’t be able to believe in capital punishment unless you’re willing to do the killing…” OK, fair enough.  You have to look the parents of a murdered child in the eye and say, “I’m sorry, killing your baby’s murder would be too much a tax-burden for the system. Why don’t you be a sport, take one for the team, and live with the fact he’s in prison eating 3-squares a day and has access to better health care than many free Americans.”

I looked it up: the savings is $175 million a year.

In a governmental budget plan, that amount is a sneeze. If it were really a problem, put a check-box on tax forms: “Would you like to contribute $5 so a serial rapist can be put to death?”

I guarantee more people would check that box, than the Do you want $3 of your federal tax to go to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund?” one.

 

Argument:   Too many innocent people die.

Counter:  Again, change the system.  If we’re talking a black man in Texas tried by an all white jury, fair enough, raise a red flag. But when we are talking about the absolutely guilty—“This hand masturbates” guilty—your argument becomes null and void.

 

Argument:  It has been proven it is not a deterrent to crime.

Counter: Who cares? I’m not arguing deterrence; I’m saying get some of these people off the planet. They do not deserve to live, and you cannot argue their life has value.

Case in point: convicted trafficker of child pornography David Renz. He was supposed to be under house arrest and wear an ankle bracelet. Supposed to be, but he took the bracelet off, carjacked a mom and daughter, raped the ten-year-old girl, and stabbed the mother to death in front of her.

Explain to me how his life has one ounce of value.

Explain why his life should not be terminated.

Do not say “It’s too expensive,” do not say “But innocents die,” do not say “He deserves to suffer.”

I have covered those three points already.

Why can we not take him to the top of a 100-story building and throw him off?

 

Argument:  The Constitution…

Counter:  Is a fluid document that changes with necessity; if the death penalty already exists, who cares whether it’s by gunshot, gas chamber, or being tossed off a building?

(Me.  I care, because I’m all for the cheapest of the three. Hell, how about this: toss him off a 100-story building, and have other convicts—prison labor—clean up the mess. Maybe then it would deter crime.)

 

Argument: I do not believe I have the moral right to sanction taking the life of another.

Counter: I do.  See the child-rapist mother-murderer above.

 

Argument:  God, Jesus, forgiveness, religion…

Counter: Dr. Suess, Grimm Fairy Tales, Children’s stories…

 

Argument:  It is impossible to create a fair system.

Counter:  You are a quitter, Mr. Cartman. When the going gets tough, “Screw you guys, I’m going home” is not the path an adult takes. With that attitude, why try anything? Someone told the Wright brothers flying was impossible. Thankfully, they didn’t believe that.

 

Argument: I am only against the death penalty because our system is not designed for truth or justice, but only which lawyers can perform the best in manipulating a judge and jury.

Counter:  I got nothing.  That is a damn fine argument. But it doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work to change the flawed system.

 

Argument: I don’t think you are wrong. I just don’t think I am, either. This all started with you saying, “I will never understand how anyone can be against the death penalty.” I’m just giving you more mentally to chew on. Maybe one day you will understand, even if you disagree.

Counter: I disagree that I was given more to chew on, but amen, brother.  Maybe I won’t change any minds with my rhetoric, either, but I still don’t know how anyone can be against killing those who have proven they have no value as human beings.

 

John E. Douglas was one of the first FBI profilers; he is a pioneer in the field of narrowing down the search criteria for serial killers. Actor Scott Glenn shadowed Douglas when preparing for his role in The Silence of the Lambs, and during discussions the “Hollywood liberal” (Douglas’ description) let it be known he held a staunchly anti-death penalty stance. Douglas nodded his head, saying, “That’s a nice luxury to have, that certainty about things.”

Douglas then played tapes for Scott.

Tapes of murderers torturing their victims and laughing, taking pleasure in causing the pain of others. Tapes the murderers made so they could relive the moment over and over again, fantasizing about their next victim, and masturbating to the memory of the previous one.

To say Scott Glenn was shaken to his core would be saying too little.

The Manufacturing of Outrage

MouseThatRoared-300x247

In early December, 2012, the media was afire with a civil rights story unlike anything seen before it: three women in California had eaten at a restaurant, and when the bill came it was discovered they had been described as “Fat girls” on it. Stories were written about their honor, the slander, and the overall outrage at something so horrible happening in the 21st Century.

In late February, 2013, Seth MacFarlane was hung out to dry by the media. After hosting the Oscars and delivering an “Ugly, sexist” performance, he was pilloried across the airwaves; it’s several weeks since the event, and I still see articles written and posted by the offended.

On March 17th, 2013, two football jocks in Steubenville Ohio were found guilty of rape, and the media…

…felt bad for two boys whose lives were ruined by the guilty verdict.

Wait, what?

No, you didn’t read that incorrectly. Major media coverage of the trial’s end involved much in the way of empathy for the two boys whose lives would be forever altered by being labeled “Sex Offenders.” This seemed to neglect the concept that they wouldn’t wear such a scarlet letter had they not committed the act of rape in the first place.

(Logic: it’s hard)

In the most widely-circulated example of identifying with the attackers, CNN’s Poppy Harlow went on ad nauseum about how horrible it was the two rapists were going to jail. Other news outlets expressed similar sorrow for the rapists, and several went so far as to publish the victim’s identity. This despite the fact she is a minor.

As I read various reports and watched the CNN video myself, I wondered how the media could cover this story with a moral compass spun so south. And then I remembered the first two stories listed above.

If I may marry Aesop and Chaucer for a moment, I would say society cried “Wolf” once too often, and because of it the chickens came home to roost.

Return to the top of this meandering thought bubble: I watched as moral outrage was flung about with self-righteous fury as three overweight women were described as “fat” by a teenager wearing a paper hat. I saw people calling for his immediate termination, and demands made that he reimburse the poor women for their bill. Multiple streams of thought fired across my synapses, none of which gave me any insight into how this event could possibly be any sort of news story in a moral world. Had nothing whatsoever happened on the planet that day, that three women with hurt feelings made the national news?

My response to it all was fairly even-keeled: Should the kid have to apologize? Sure, why not? But fired? Made to pay for their bill? Oh hell-to-the no.

(*snaps fingers*)

But, as said, I saw people calling for his head on a platter; “You have no idea what it’s like to not want to eat right or exercise!” was shouted in furious indignation.

(Well, I could be paraphrasing there, but that was technically the core of the matter. It seemed to be nothing more than a victim mentality, if you will, where not eating salad and/or going for the occasional walk somehow meant that it was the big wide world’s fault the angry few didn’t look like Victoria’s Secret models.)

Next up: Seth MacFarlane at the Oscars. Seth-Screaming Liberal-MacFarlane. A man who is almost over-the-top pro-gay and pro-woman; a man who donates money to both gay and women’s causes. Because he was hosting, for the first time in years I tuned in to watch millionaires hand millionaires statues and clap one another on the back because of how wonderful they all are. “Why not?” I asked. “I loves me the Family Guy; let’s see what Seth brings to the table.” Turns out, I should have taken his turn hosting Saturday Night Live as an ominous harbinger  of what was to come.

As I watched the train wreck unfold, all I could think was, “Wow, how boring.” I had hoped for a bit of the Comedy Central Roast-host Seth; I got vanilla ice cream. Sure, he had a zinger here and there—Rihanna took one on the chin for being an idiot who supports the abuse of women; Mel Gibson was hit for one of his old tirades—but those few moments aside, all was bland.

Imagine my surprise when the next day all I saw were cries of sexism, homophobia, and more sexism. At first I wondered if I had watched the same show as some of the outraged commentators, but then I started reading their articles. Every one of them looked like a Mad Libs version of journalism, where the template had been laid long before the event.  “I was outraged when Seth said __________. And when he made the joke about _________, that crossed the line of good taste.”

It made me depressed, because it has been said that if you have to explain a joke, it’s not funny. But what do you do when people are just so fucking stupid (meaning wrapped up in self righteous indignation) that explaining the point they missed is the only approach?

Which brings it all home to Ohio.

In Steubenville, a poor girl was drugged and violated. As if that wasn’t horrific enough, pictures were taken of the event and spread around. As if THAT wasn’t enough, local authorities pooh-poohed everything, declining to investigate the crime and treating the local football jocks guilty of  everything in a “Boys will be boys” manner.

(Well, only if they can throw a football, that is. Had the local dirtball been picked up for a minor pot offense, I can only assume he would have been jailed immediately.)

If not for the wonders of the Internet and the talents of Anonymous, things might not have come to light. But Anonymous fought for what was right, and in the end two of the many criminals that night (and I include those who witnessed without participating as criminals) to justice.

And, as said above, the media wept.

No, not for the victim, but for the athletes who had their lives ruined.

Again, I wondered how such a wrong-minded position could be taken, and I remembered what happens when you stretch thin your point.

I shall explain.

In the early 1990s, a group of “concerned families” decided to protest the show Married With Children. They decried it as horrific, and an attack on American Family Values. Personally, I found the show funny, and had the thought, “If you don’t like it, don’t watch it.”

(Logic: still hard)

What happened next was interesting. I’m not sure if it was the same proponents of the American Family, or if another group tried to piggyback the first, but another villain was pointed out and attacked. This new villain would influence children to speak out against their parents, cause trouble in school, and disrupt the moral fabric of society.

The villain was: Bart Simpson.

Suddenly, anyone attacking TV seemed a lot less serious and a lot more silly. The core message had been watered down, and that’s all it took to end every anti-show movement.

When the Ohio rapists were convicted, many, many people said “They never should have taken those pictures.” Not, “They never should have raped that girl,” but “They never should have taken those pictures.”

When the women in California received their bill, very few voices said, “That kid should have taken ‘Fat girls’ off the receipt before giving it to them,” but many cried, “How dare he have that awful message on there in the first place!”

Notice the difference?

Relating that to what I’m discussing today:

  • When outrage is pushed as the agenda du jour…
  • When you say that three women who refuse to hit the treadmill are worthy of attention because they were made fun of…
  • When you refuse to see the subtext of a joke and glean the meaning behind someone’s train of thought and instead crow about your limited way of viewing the world…

…then you become too one-note and not worth listening to. Unfortunately, if a sane voice then tries to rise up amidst the ocean of nonsense, it won’t be heard.

In this case, the breaking point came at the expense of a young woman in Ohio, someone who deserved better than to hear she ruined the lives of her rapists.

But hey…

Those women in California, they did get that one kid fired from his job.

So… win?

The Hounds of Winter

winter3On March 18, 2013, the Mrs. and I watched American Winter on HBO. If you are unfamiliar, it is a documentary about poverty in our United States, filmed in Portland, Oregon, using eight diverse families to make up its storyline. The eight families are all dealing with various problems: A single mother—her husband passed away—lives with her son in a garage. A windowless, one-car garage. A woman whose daughter needed medical treatments struggles to pay the $49,000 bill. A 50-year-old man who once pulled in a $50,000 annual salary is laid off, leaving him to care for his Down syndrome son with no income. The  myriad stories all carry tragedy within their covers.

These are not people who lived large and were caught unaware by the economic downturn; they didn’t buy mansions in the housing boom when rates were low and get underwater when the variable rate shot up. They live in trailer parks, impossibly-small looking homes, and apartments, and yet they struggle to put food on the table and keep the electricity on.

As I watched, I was taken to a time in my life I don’t revisit often: my very early childhood, when my family was on food stamps. Because of this upbringing, I am incredibly thrifty when it comes to money. For example: I have been eying a $28 Batman shirt on Amazon for several months now. It is something I can easily afford, and yet I don’t buy it. Many thoughts that go through my head as I window-shop it repeatedly, first and foremost being: “You have several Batman shirts already, fuckhead.” Above and beyond that is the idea that spending $28 on a T-Shirt is just silly. I almost bought it once, but after clicking “Add to Cart” became irritated by the fact there was a shipping charge. The Mrs. and I are members of Amazon Prime, which generally means 2-Day shipping is included free. Unfortunately, in the case of my Batman shirt, the seller was a second-party vendor, meaning our perks didn’t apply. “Well, fuck them,” I thought as I deleted my order. I was pissed enough I was spending twenty-goddamn-eight dollars for something I didn’t need, the fuck if I was going to add $5 on top of that.

Again, I can afford the $5 shipping fee, but it was a convenient out for me, a way of being mock angry instead of dealing with the real issue swimming in my subconscious: fear. In almost every situation I have an opportunity to spend, the niggling little thought in the back of my mind screams, “What if I need this money for something more important, later?” This idea has swelled my bank account, as I find saving greenbacks to be a better use of them than “making it rain.”

My point of view is also, unfortunately, one that makes me see poverty from a sometimes-cruel angle. When the documentary showed a family struggling to pay their electric bill—the husband/father unable to find work—my first thought was, “Well, why didn’t he hoard the cash he spent on getting those tattoos? That could have been money to pull from a bank account right there.”

I am not proud of such moments, but do admit they freight train through my mind uncontrolled.

If marriage is a system of opposites and balance, it makes sense that Lydia is the yin to my yang, as she can spend money as easily as she sneezes. Our 2013 tax return was higher than either of us expected it to be, and before you could say “Blueberry pancakes” Lydia had her sights set on American consumerism.

On Sunday, March 17th, we went shopping for a new dining room table. There’s nothing wrong with our current dining room table, but Lydia doesn’t like it. That alone is enough of a flaw for her to want it replaced.

“It’s too big for our dining area,” she claims. “I’m tired of always bumping into the damn thing.”

At the furniture store, my input was desired, but what I was willing to give was all-too-honest. “What do you think of this one?” was responded to with “I think the table we have at home is fine.” I wasn’t saying it in a dickish or rude tone, more a mix of confused-we’re-spending-money and matter-of-factly.

Lydia eventually settled on two tables she liked: a high-top and standard-height. I liked the high-top, she liked the standard-height. Because she is a generous woman who likes to placate her pouty husband, we ended up ordering the one I preferred.

And that was that.

Until we started watching the documentary, and I saw eight families watch their lives disintegrate from underneath them in a manner of mere months. Every story contained the arc from loss of job, through debt, to desperation. The mantra repeated throughout was: “This could happen to anyone.”

As trained by my childhood, I said to Lydia, “This is why we shouldn’t buy tables we don’t need.”

Lydia was frustrated with me, and rightfully so. She thought on it a minute, then said, “You know what I was thinking while that documentary was on? I was thinking how good it made me feel that every year I donate so much time to the food pantry I support.”

That, of course, is why I married her.

Everything in life is perspective, and if Lydia tolerates me long enough, her positivity and kindness might just shine through the doom-and-gloom scenarios I always default to.

And maybe, just maybe, I can nudge her a little toward my ant-like behavior, and help her dial back her grasshopper’s song.

The Disintegration of Good

dry-desert-wastelandOn Thursday, January 31st, 2013, I was listening to the hippie, liberal news radio station known as NPR. One of their entertainment correspondents came on and discussed the end of the television show 30 Rock; its series finale was occurring that evening. The man spoke of the change in American television viewing habits, and pointed out they were not for the better. Thursday nights used to be “Must See TV” for 30 Rock’s host network, NBC. They once dominated the ratings with smart, funny shows such as Friends, Fraiser, and Seinfeld. Today, the commentator bemoaned, intelligent television struggles. 30 Rock was another casualty of low ratings, as is the current best show on television, Community, and the last best show on television, Arrested Development. These are shows that did not pander to the audience, but instead challenged them to keep up with the pace of the writing.

In the place of smart TV came offerings like The Big Bang Theory and Two and a Half Men, kindly described as “broad comedies,” for their broad appeal. These are shows with generic jokes that never ask anything of the viewing audience; a form of “White Noise Television,” to put it another way. These are programs you can “watch” while Facebooking, preparing dinner, or doing any activity that does not involve focusing on the show while it plays in the background.

As I listened to the NPR commentator, I thought of the article I had read the night before, a piece in Bloomberg Businessweek. It was a report on the lack of innovation currently taking place in America; the lack of reward corporations receive for being ambitious. It noted that in times of economic caution, many companies cut their research and development budgets first, to protect the bottom line. In order to keep costs low, it is safer to lay off employees than risk pouring money into developing a new product. This is true across the spectrum of industry, from electronics, to retail, to pharmaceutical and beyond.

One example of punishing innovation is that of JC Penney, currently the most hated company in America. They essentially revamped their entire pricing structure for the better, but since people hate change, consumers stopped shopping there in droves. The stock price has plummeted, and in 2013 the company will shutter 300 stores. All because they wanted to provide better service to their customers.

Another example involves a story about a company that had essentially cured Lyme Disease. Unfortunately, the market for the pill wasn’t big enough, so they shitcanned the department and moved on to other things, like erection pills. Because profit > quality of life.

In my mind, I parallel the NPR take on television and the Bloomberg essay on innovation: the American public does not like quality television, and American businessmen don’t like companies that are ambitious. I find that frightening, and it makes me worry for the future. What does it say when the concept “Creating is bad” is championed over innovation?

If you look back and really study television, a downward spiral can be found: the 1970s gave us All in the Family and M*A*S*H, the 1980s Hill Street Blues, Cheers, and St. Elsewhere… today we have Gray’s Anatomy and Two Broke Girls.

If you look at innovation in the marketplace, the Boeing Dreamliner is currently grounded, while the Airbus A380 is flying high. Small minded and fearful people have tried to stymie scientific progress in America at every turn, while Asia is pushing the boundaries of stem cell advancement.

When we settle for less, we strive for less, and I find that disheartening, and a problem. Not to say that everything good is non-existent, and everything awful succeeds. Beacons of hope in the world of entertainment include the success of South Park, Archer, Game of Thrones and Breaking Bad, as well as the failures of Animal Practice and Terri Schiavo existence of Whitney. Technologically, the American company Apple gave us the iPod, Phone, and Pad. But it America also offered the world the Segway, so… yeah. Our bad.

I cannot completely articulate my thoughts on the matter, but maybe I don’t have to. Maybe it is enough for me to notice the trend, and put it out there for anyone reading this drivel to ponder on their own. Karl Marx said “Religion is the opiate of the masses;” Edward R. Murrow went one step sideways and changed the saying, calling television the drug that will dilute our minds. At this point, both thoughts seem all too true in the race for the decline of progress. At least 30 Rock got seven seasons. Don’t Trust the B got the shaft in the middle of year two.

Older posts «